Browse Articles

Article|12 Apr 2017|OPEN
Genotyping-by-sequencing of pear (Pyrus spp.) accessions unravels novel patterns of genetic diversity and selection footprints
Satish Kumar1 , , Chris Kirk2 , Cecilia Deng3 , Claudia Wiedow2 , Mareike Knaebel2 and Lester Brewer,4
1The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Hawke’s Bay Research Centre, Havelock North, New Zealand
2Palmerston North Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand
3Mount Albert Research Centre, Auckland, New Zealand
4Motueka Research Centre, Motueka, New Zealand
*Corresponding author. E-mail: Satish.Kumar@plantandfood.co.nz

Horticulture Research 4,
Article number: 15 (2017)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.15
Views: 954

Received: 07 Dec 2016
Revised: 22 Feb 2017
Accepted: 22 Feb 2017
Published online: 12 Apr 2017

Abstract

Understanding of genetic diversity and marker-trait relationships in pears (Pyrus spp.) forms an important part of gene conservation and cultivar breeding. Accessions of Asian and European pear species, and interspecific hybrids were planted in a common garden experiment. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was used to genotype 214 accessions, which were also phenotyped for fruit quality traits. A combination of selection scans and association analyses were used to identify signatures of selection. Patterns of genetic diversity, population structure and introgression were also investigated. About 15 000 high-quality SNP markers were identified from the GBS data, of which 25% and 11% harboured private alleles for European and Asian species, respectively. Bayesian clustering analysis suggested negligible gene flow, resulting in highly significant population differentiation (Fst=0.45) between Asian and European pears. Interspecific hybrids displayed an average of 55% and 45% introgression from their Asian and European ancestors, respectively. Phenotypic (firmness, acidity, shape and so on) variation between accessions was significantly associated with genetic differentiation. Allele frequencies at large-effect SNP loci were significantly different between genetic groups, suggesting footprints of directional selection. Selection scan analyses identified over 20 outlier SNP loci with substantial statistical support, likely to be subject to directional selection or closely linked to loci under selection.