Browse Articles

Article|09 Sep 2024|OPEN
Exploring genetic diversity, population structure, and subgenome differences in the allopolyploid Camelina sativa: implications for future breeding and research studies
Jordan R. Brock1 , , Kevin A. Bird2 , Adrian E. Platts1 , Fabio Gomez-Cano3 , Suresh Kumar Gupta3 , Kyle Palos4 , Caylyn E. Railey4,5 , Scott J. Teresi1,6 , Yun Sun Lee3 , Maria Magallanes-Lundback1 , Emily G. Pawlowski3 and Andrew D.L. Nelson4 , Erich Grotewold3 , , Patrick P. Edger,1 ,
1Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, 1066 Bogue St, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
2Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824-6473, USA
4Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, 533 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
5Plant Biology Graduate Field, Cornell University, 533 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
6Genetics and Genome Sciences Program, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd Room 2165, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*Corresponding author. E-mail: brockjor@msu.edu,grotewol@msu.edu,edgerpat@msu.edu

Horticulture Research 11,
Article number: uhae247 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae247
Views: 2424

Received: 01 May 2024
Accepted: 26 Aug 2024
Published online: 09 Sep 2024

Abstract

Camelina (Camelina sativa), an allohexaploid species, is an emerging aviation biofuel crop that has been the focus of resurgent interest in recent decades. To guide future breeding and crop improvement efforts, the community requires a deeper comprehension of subgenome dominance, often noted in allopolyploid species, “alongside an understanding of the genetic diversity” and population structure of material present within breeding programs. We conducted population genetic analyses of a C. sativa diversity panel, leveraging a new genome, to estimate nucleotide diversity and population structure, and analyzed for patterns of subgenome expression dominance among different organs. Our analyses confirm that C. sativa has relatively low genetic diversity and show that the SG3 subgenome has substantially lower genetic diversity compared to the other two subgenomes. Despite the low genetic diversity, our analyses identified 13 distinct subpopulations including two distinct wild populations and others putatively representing founders in existing breeding populations. When analyzing for subgenome composition of long non-coding RNAs, which are known to play important roles in (a)biotic stress tolerance, we found that the SG3 subgenome contained significantly more lincRNAs compared to other subgenomes. Similarly, transcriptome analyses revealed that expression dominance of SG3 is not as strong as previously reported and may not be universal across all organ types. From a global analysis, SG3 “was only significant higher expressed” in flower, flower bud, and fruit organs, which is an important discovery given that the crop yield is associated with these organs. Collectively, these results will be valuable for guiding future breeding efforts in camelina.