Browse Articles

Article|25 Mar 2024|OPEN
Integrative analysis of the methylome and transcriptome of tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum L.) induced by postharvest handling
Jiaqi Zhou1 , Sitian Zhou1,2 , Bixuan Chen1,3 , Kamonwan Sangsoy4 and Kietsuda Luengwilai4 , Karin Albornoz1,5 , Diane M. Beckles,1 ,
1Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, CA, USA
2Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
3Germains Seed Technology, 8333 Swanston Lane, Gilroy, CA 95020, USA
4Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
5Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, Coastal Research and Education Center, Clemson University, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414 USA
*Corresponding author. E-mail: dmbeckles@ucdavis.edu

Horticulture Research 11,
Article number: uhae095 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae095
Views: 1308

Received: 18 Oct 2023
Revised: 11 Apr 2024
Published online: 25 Mar 2024

Abstract

Tomato fruit ripening is triggered by the demethylation of key genes, which alters their transcriptional levels thereby initiating and propagating a cascade of physiological events. What is unknown is how these processes are altered when fruit are ripened using postharvest practices to extend shelf-life, as these practices often reduce fruit quality. To address this, postharvest handling-induced changes in the fruit DNA methylome and transcriptome, and how they correlate with ripening speed, and ripening indicators such as ethylene, abscisic acid, and carotenoids, were assessed. This study comprehensively connected changes in physiological events with dynamic molecular changes. Ripening fruit that reached ‘Turning’ (T) after dark storage at 20°C, 12.5°C, or 5°C chilling (followed by 20°C rewarming) were compared to fresh-harvest fruit ‘FHT’. Fruit stored at 12.5°C had the biggest epigenetic marks and alterations in gene expression, exceeding changes induced by postharvest chilling. Fruit physiological and chronological age were uncoupled at 12.5°C, as the time-to-ripening was the longest. Fruit ripening to Turning at 12.5°C was not climacteric; there was no respiratory or ethylene burst, rather, fruit were high in abscisic acid. Clear differentiation between postharvest-ripened and ‘FHT’ was evident in the methylome and transcriptome. Higher expression of photosynthetic genes and chlorophyll levels in ‘FHT’ fruit pointed to light as influencing the molecular changes in fruit ripening. Finally, correlative analyses of the -omics data putatively identified genes regulated by DNA methylation. Collectively, these data improve our interpretation of how tomato fruit ripening patterns are altered by postharvest practices, and long-term are expected to help improve fruit quality.